Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Jes Solar Company Limited, et al v. Matinee Energy Incorporated, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-16015
Defendant / Appellee: TONG SOO CHUNG, husband and S. CHIN KIM, husband
Defendant: JEOUNG, First Name Unknown; named as Jane Doe Jeoung, wife, PAUL JEOUNG, husband, CHUNG, First Name Unknown; named as Jane Doe Chung, wife and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AIRPARK COMPANY LIMITED, a South Korean Corporation, HANKOOK TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, a South Korean Corporation and JES SOLAR COMPANY LIMITED, a South Korean Corporation
Jes Solar Company Limited, et al v. Matinee Energy Incorporated, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16748
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN S. LEE, husband, TONG SOO CHUNG, husband, PAUL JEOUNG, husband and others
Defendant: CHUN RAE KIM, husband, JEOUNG, First Name Unknown; named as Jane Doe Jeoung, wife, CHUNG, First Name Unknown; named as Jane Doe Chung, wife and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HANKOOK TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, a South Korean Corporation, JES SOLAR COMPANY LIMITED, a South Korean Corporation and AIRPARK COMPANY LIMITED, a South Korean Corporation
Mickey Clayton v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., et al
as 19-15766
Defendant / Appellee: HSBC BANK USA, N.A., trustee of Nomura Asset-Backed Certificate Series, 2006-AF1 and WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant: AMERICA'S SERVICING COMPANY, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: White Corporations I-X and FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICKEY NELSON CLAYTON, husband
Brenda Ostler v. Keith Sego, et al
as 16-16604
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRENDA OSTLER
Defendant - Appellee: KEITH SEGO, individually and as husband, RITA SEGO, individually and as wife and UNKNOWN PARTIES, John Does and/or Jane Does I-X and Black Corporations and/or White Corporations I-X
Patrick Erhard, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 14-17053
Plaintiff - Appellant: PATRICK ERHARD, Husband and MARILYN ERHARD, Wife
Defendant - Appellee: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Certificate Holders of the First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF15 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-FF15, FIRST FRANKLIN MORTGAGE TRUST, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-16512
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jennifer Harwood v. Crestar Mortgage, et al
as 13-15086
Plaintiff - Appellant: JENNIFER MICHELE HARWOOD
Defendant - Appellee: CRESTAR MORTGAGE, SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC and others
Terry Stadler v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 13-15047
Plaintiff - Appellant: TERRY STADLER, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kristi Stadler, and on behalf of the statutory beneficiaries, including, but not limited to Kennedy Larson Garcia, surviving child Estate of Kristi Stadler on behalf of Kennedy La
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF PHOENIX, STATE OF ARIZONA, BENJAMIN AUER, Officer # 6889, husband and others
Laquinn Fisher v. City of Mesa, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-16661
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAQUINN FISHER, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF MESA, UNKNOWN CAMPBELL, named as Sgt. Campbell (Badge No. 10729), invidually and acting on behalf of the the Mesa Police Department, UNKNOWN SPOUSE CAMPBELL, named as Jane Doe Campbell and others
Michael Salman, et al v. City of Phoenix, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-16497
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL SALMAN and SUZANNE SALMAN, husband and wife
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation of the State of Arizona and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: John Does I-X, Jane Does I-X, Black and White Corporations I-X, and ABC Partnerships I-X

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?