Cases 21 - 30 of 37,557
Kubica
as 2:2024cv04257
Petitioner:
Anton Michael Kubica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Neda Mehrabani v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv04285
Petitioner:
Neda Mehrabani
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Kubica v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv04217
Petitioner:
Anton Michael Kubica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gustavo Guzman v. The State of California
as 2:2024cv04268
Petitioner:
Gustavo Guzman
Respondent:
The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fernando Miguel De Oliveira v. CDCR-California Institution for Women et al
as 5:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Fernando Miquel De Oliveira
Defendant:
CDCR-California Institution for Women, L. Parker, Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moises Lopez v. B. Phillips
as 2:2024cv04204
Petitioner:
Moises Lopez
Respondent:
B. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trayshawn McGruder v. People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv04295
Petitioner:
Trayshawn McGruder
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwin Coyoy v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv04206
Plaintiff:
Edwin Coyoy
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles and Sheriff Robert G. Luna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyrell Ainsworth v. T. Macias et al
as 2:2024cv04173
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Ainsworth
Defendant:
T. Macias, Dr. Gray, McGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
