Cases 31 - 40 of 292
Cymeyon C. Hill v. Dr. Brodey et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Dr. Brodey, F. Wallace and Art Moralez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yahshalom B.J. Gray v. L.A. County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Yahshalom B.J. Gray
Defendant:
L.A. County Sheriff Dept., Jonathan Hill, J. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr v. James Hill et al
as 5:2022cv02072
Plaintiff:
LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr
Defendant:
James Hill, R. Roble, V. Vasques and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Armando Zelaya v. James Hill
as 2:2022cv08311
Petitioner:
Jose Armando Zelaya
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrew Valles v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 5:2022cv01950
Plaintiff:
Andrew Valles
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Kathleen Allison, Connie Gipson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Singletary v. James S. Hill
as 5:2022cv02130
Petitioner:
Charles Singletary
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrew Valles v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 2:2022cv05919
Plaintiff:
Andrew Valles
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Connie Gipson, James S. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob Briseno v. James S. Hill
as 5:2022cv01454
Petitioner:
Jacob Briseno
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Teral Sherman v. James S. Hill et al
as 5:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Teral Sherman
Defendant:
James S. Hill, M. Torres, D. Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teral Sherman v. James S. Hill
as 2:2022cv04683
Petitioner:
Teral Sherman
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
