Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jeffrey Xiao et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv01623
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Xiao and Motel 8, LLC
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does 1-10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Xiao Hu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2023cv05463
Plaintiff:
Xiao Hu
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Rosemary Langley Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Yingchun Xiao v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 5:2023cv01286
Plaintiff:
MS. YINGCHUN XIAO and Yingchun Xiao
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and Hon. Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Hongxue Xiao v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 2:2023cv03473
Plaintiff:
Hongxue Xiao
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
