Cases 91 - 100 of 17,468
(HC) Hernandez-Velasquez v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
as 1:2024cv00130
Petitioner:
Jeison Hernandez-Velasquez
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Kalso v. Butte County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv00653
Petitioner:
Zachary Lloyd Kalso
Respondent:
Butte County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Coleman v. Sacramento Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv00576
Petitioner:
Andrew Coleman and Andrew James Coleman
Respondent:
Sacramento Sheriff's Office, DA and County Law Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Bustos v. Taylor
as 1:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Juan Bustos
Respondent:
T. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Tate v. Borla
as 1:2024cv00324
Petitioner:
LeRoy Tate, Jr.
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Valencia v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00312
Petitioner:
Raul A. Valencia
Respondent:
Tammy Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Vasko v. Amador County Jail (Sheriff)
as 2:2024cv00427
Petitioner:
Sean Michael Vasko
Respondent:
Amador County Jail (Sheriff)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Jasso v. Matteson
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Giovanni Thomas Jasso
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Phan v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00735
Petitioner:
Minh Kha Hoang Phan
Respondent:
P. Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Williams v. People of the State of California
as 1:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Tyrone Williams
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.