Cases 131 - 140 of 44,702
(PC) Good v. Shasta County Sheriff Dept
as 2:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Good
Defendant:
Shasta County Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Casity v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
Richard Casity and Richard D. Casity
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison and B. Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Tessmer v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01500
Petitioner:
Robert Henry Tessmer Jr.
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Mitchell v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Corey Mitchell
Defendant:
R. St. Andre, R. Broomfield, N. Albonico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Sipes v. Corcoran California State Prison
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Todd Sipes
Respondent:
Corcoran California State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01511
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene James
Respondent:
Sacramento County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Diaz v. Gonzales
as 2:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
Jesus Diaz
Defendant:
E. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Papazian v. B.M. Trate
as 1:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
James Michael Papazian
Respondent:
B.M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Carroll et al v. State of California et al
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Carroll, Johnetta Ross and Amazing Ross
Defendant:
State of California, Gavin Newsome, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Good v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Good
Defendant:
Patty Pearson, Michael Richlin, Alicia Richlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
