Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012at00032
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. Meddock et al
as 2:2011at01819
Defendant: Dwight Meddock , Glen A Barton, Gloria L Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YOUNG v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 1:2011at00691
Plaintiff: BONNIE YOUNG
Defendant: California Highway Patrol, BILL A BOWERS and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARMA v. SHARMA et al
as 2:2010at01241
Plaintiff: RAJ KAMARI SHARMA
Defendant: KARTARI LAL SHARMA, Does 1-10 inclusive and Wachovia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colbert v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2010at00216
Plaintiff: Randy Colbert
Defendant: Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., Does 1-10 inclusive and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009at01011
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02247
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009at01004
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00804
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nelson v. Guild Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2008at00259
Plaintiff: Adam Nelson
Defendant: Guild Mortgage Company and Does 1-10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?