Cases 121 - 130 of 388
Wilson v. Love et al
as 3:2020cv01698
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, an Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and Judith Love Love
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Cameron Dyess v. Estate of Jajuan Lee Morton et al
as 4:2020cv00909
Plaintiff:
CAMERON DYESS
Defendant:
PA SOLUTIONS, INC. and ESTATE OF JAJUAN LEE MORTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Amtrak et al
as 3:2019cv08068
Defendant:
Doe Owner, Doe Employer, Doe Driver and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sibia v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2019cv07620
Plaintiff:
Rajinder Sibia and Rajinder Singh Sibia
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service and Falcon Ishmael Fernando Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Madlock v. United Stated Postal Service et al.
as 4:2019cv06529
Plaintiff:
Daijahnique Madlock
Defendant:
Max Cheng and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manuel Joseph Tena et al v. Tena et al
as 4:2019cv06148
Defendant:
Jeanine Elizabeth Reina, Randall Reina and Jr. Manuel Joseph Tena
Plaintiff:
Jose Soria and Manuel Joseph Tena, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Layhee v. Fratila
as 4:2019cv05756
Plaintiff:
Darcie Layhee
Defendant:
Bogdan-Cristian Fratila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Padilla et al v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 5:2019cv05560
Plaintiff:
Juan padilla, MGR, Sandra Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
The United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Hurst v. Bigge Cranes and Rigging Co., et al
as 3:2019cv05442
Defendant:
Daniel Rainford, Bigge Cranes and Rigging Co., and Danny Rainford
Plaintiff:
Yumiko Hurst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Luna et al v. Kolke et al
as 4:2019cv05632
Plaintiff:
Jane Luna and Montclaire Erguiza Luna
Defendant:
SRW Products, PV Holding Corporation and Darren Richard Kolke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
