Cases 21 - 30 of 26,465
Epps v. San Mateo County et al
as 3:2024cv03471
Plaintiff:
Daniel T Epps
Defendant:
San Mateo County, San Mateo County Jail/Maguire Correctional Facility, California Board of Registered Nurses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Holbrook et al
as 5:2024cv03474
Plaintiff:
Kevin Price
Defendant:
David Holbrook, Jesse Suarez and Shina Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beal v. District Attorney Alameda
as 1:2024cv03470
Petitioner:
Charles Clifton Beal
Respondent:
District Attorney Alameda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norato v. Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital
as 5:2024cv03408
Plaintiff:
Casey John Norato
Defendant:
Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coughlin v. McGillivrary
as 5:2024cv03420
Plaintiff:
Zachary Barker Coughlin
Defendant:
Kevin McGillivrary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Monterey County Superior Corut et al
as 4:2024cv03419
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Monterey County Superior Corut and Court Clerk's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledezma v. Hill
as 5:2024cv03393
Petitioner:
Joe Ledezma
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
