Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Stephens v. Hausner et al
as 5:2023cv06022
Plaintiff:
Dean P. Stephens
Defendant:
Dr. Hausner, Dan Gallager, Santa Rosa Parole Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanford v. Perez et al
as 3:2023cv04211
Plaintiff:
Terrell Cordarryl Stanford
Defendant:
Lt. B. Perez, J. Coleman, B. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv09101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosas v. Robertson
as 5:2022cv07765
Petitioner:
Manuel Dejesus Rosas
Respondent:
James Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hart v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2022cv07674
Plaintiff:
Stephen S. Hart
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, City of Santa Rosa, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogbu v. Rosa et al
as 4:2022cv02352
Petitioner:
Uchechukwu Ogbu
Respondent:
Director, Division o Guillermo Viera Rosa and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Napa State Hospital et al
as 5:2021cv06512
Plaintiff:
Alphonso R. Clark
Defendant:
Napa State Hospital, Romono, Edward Kookhyung Chough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harker-Lozada v. City of Santa Rosa et al
as 5:2021cv02921
Defendant:
City of Santa Rosa Police Department, Matthew Meloche, R J Navarro and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Harker-Lozada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lozada v. Santa Rosa 800 Plaza Macy's Dept Store et al
as 5:2021cv00454
Defendant:
Santa Rosa 800 Plaza Macy's Dept Store and Matt Raaberg
Plaintiff:
Victor M Lozada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
