Cases 31 - 40 of 556
Meza v. Spearman et al
as 5:2018cv05668
Defendant:
B. Rice, Spearman and Curry
Plaintiff:
Christopher Meza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Under Armour, Inc. v. Battle Fashions, Inc. et al
as 3:2018mc80117
Plaintiff:
Under Armour, Inc.
Undetermined:
Wardell Stephen Curry, II
Defendant:
Battle Fashions, Inc. and Kelsey Battle
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Hughes et al v. Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02762
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Hughes , Amanda Schweickert , Amy Senft Ritter and others
Defendant:
Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc. and Tailored Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mackonochie et al v. Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02761
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Mackonochie , Ruth Holte , Ruthanne Rhone and others
Defendant:
Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc. and Tailored Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crowhaven Productions. LLC v. Currie
as 4:2018cv02183
Plaintiff:
Crowhaven Productions. LLC
Defendant:
James Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Damer v. Horsley et al
as 3:2018cv01819
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Raymond Damer
Defendant:
Donald Horsley, Steven Dylina, Marie Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Curry
as 4:2017cv05967
Plaintiff:
Rogelio May Ruiz
Defendant:
J. Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Curry
as 4:2017cv05570
Plaintiff:
Rogelio May Ruiz
Defendant:
J. Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Muniz et al
as 5:2017cv05036
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rene Hernandez
Defendant:
William Muniz, R. Curry, S. Springer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv03755
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jafurl Parks , James Kovacs , Mike Kazmierczak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
