Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Agrawal et al v. Musk et al
as 3:2024cv01304
Defendant:
X Corp., Elon Musk, Twitter, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Parag Agrawal, Ned Segal, Vijaya Gadde and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Ned v. Tesla, Inc.
as 3:2023cv03926
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Ned
Defendant:
Tesla, Inc. dba Tesla Motors, Inc. and Tesla, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as Tesla Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
TPCO US Holdings, LLC v. Ned Fussell
as 3:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
TPCO US Holding, LLC
Defendant:
Ned Fussell and MosaicAg. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Williams v. USA
as 4:2022cv03001
Petitioner:
Archie Ned Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Livingston v. Pneu-Logic Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv07155
Defendant:
J. Ned Dempsey and Pneu-Logic Corporation
Plaintiff:
Grace Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barclift v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv07992
Plaintiff:
Khafre Barclift
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc., Jack Dorsey and Ned Segal
Petitioner:
Twitter Investor Group and Weston Family Partnership LLLP
Hasan v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv07149
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc., Jack Dorsey and Ned Segal
Plaintiff:
Khan M Hasan
Wang v. Quantenna Communications, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv02511
Defendant:
Mark A. Stevens, Quantenna Communications, Inc., Dr. Sam Heidari and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Clarke v. Quantenna Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02508
Defendant:
Mark A. Stevens, Quantenna Communications, Inc., Jack Lazar and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv06929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
