Cases 151 - 160 of 4,085
Foster v. Unknown
as 3:2022cv00983
Petitioner:
Carlos Randolph Foster
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. State of California
as 3:2022cv00832
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Hartley et al
as 3:2022cv00775
Petitioner:
Marcel D. Price
Respondent:
James D. Hartley, Merrick Garland and Sean Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. San Diego Sheriff's Department
as 3:2022cv00816
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Williams
Respondent:
San Diego Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardiser v. Madden
as 3:2022cv00743
Petitioner:
Jason Warren Gardiser
Respondent:
R. Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rico v. Holbrook et al
as 3:2022cv00701
Petitioner:
Aaron David Rico, III
Respondent:
David Holbrook and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2022cv00912
Petitioner:
Marcel D. Price
Respondent:
Warren L. Montgomery and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Radloff v. Pallares
as 3:2022cv00746
Petitioner:
Jamie Nichole Radloff
Respondent:
Michael Pallares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolin v. State of California
as 3:2022cv00831
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunbar v. Campos
as 3:2022cv00875
Petitioner:
Michael Ladre Dunbar
Respondent:
Raul Campos, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
