Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hucul v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2020cv00035
Defendant:
Administration for Children and Families, Office of Child Support Enforcement and United States Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff:
Michael Hucul
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 fi
M.M.M et al v. SESSIONS et al
as 3:2018cv01832
Plaintiff:
M.M.M., L.C.O., I.A.T. and others
Defendant:
Alex Azar, Daniel A. Bible, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Hucul v. Mathews Burwell et al
as 3:2016cv01244
Plaintiff:
Michael Hucul
Defendant:
United States Department of Health of Human Services and it's Sceretary, Sylvia Mathews Burwell, State of Michigan and it's Governor, Richard Dale Snyder , State of California and it's Governor, Edmund G. Brown Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kripke v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al
as 3:2016cv01214
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kripke
Defendant:
United States Food and Drug Administration , Robert M. Califf , United States Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Fakhri Salem, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2012cv01204
Plaintiff:
Fakhri Salem, Inc. and Fakhri Salem, M.D.
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
v. Palomar Medical Center et al
as 3:2010cv01252
Plaintiff:
Palomar Medical Center
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
First Fishery Development Services, Inc v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al
as 3:2009cv02346
Plaintiff:
First Fishery Development Services, Inc
Defendant:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Margaret A Hamburg, Robert J Deininger and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
