Cases 21 - 30 of 111
Adan v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2019cv01523
Plaintiff:
Rashid Adan
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 inclusive, Officer Jason Langley and City of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Gash v. Community Houseingworks et al
as 3:2018cv02477
Defendant:
Mission Grove Housing, L.P., Mission Grove Housing Associates, Community Housingworks and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Davis Gash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02456
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Robinson v. Brown et al
as 3:2018cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kylah Robinson
Defendant:
Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gash v. Robinwood Plaza Apartments, L.P. et al
as 3:2016cv02435
Plaintiff:
Roy Davis Gash
Defendant:
Robinwood Plaza Apartments, L.P., Mike McGrath and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Gash v. Ulric 264, LP et al
as 3:2016cv02436
Plaintiff:
Roy Davis Gash
Defendant:
Ulric 264, LP, Whitewater Sands, LLC and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Gash v. King David, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02432
Plaintiff:
Roy Davis Gash
Defendant:
King David, LLC, F and F Property Management, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Gash v. P.V.A. LTD. et al
as 3:2016cv02434
Plaintiff:
Roy Davis Gash
Defendant:
P.V.A. LTD., Maria Rojis and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Gash v. Kajjy et al
as 3:2016cv02256
Plaintiff:
Roy Davis Gash
Defendant:
Giovanna Kajjy, GMK Properties LLC and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
