Cases 161 - 170 of 12,114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02138
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kinsey v. Hill et al
as 3:2023cv02325
Petitioner:
Jonathan R. Kinsey
Defendant:
Attorney General of California
Respondent:
Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Gonzalez #3965 et al
as 3:2023cv02026
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dawel Gomez
Defendant:
Emilio Gonzalez #3965 and San Diego Central Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bibbs et al v. Doe 2
as 3:2023cv02271
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs and John Doe 1
Defendant:
John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Franks v. Roberts et al
as 3:2023cv02130
Petitioner:
Tom M. Franks
Respondent:
Assoc Warden S Roberts, Shakiba and Mahamad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Macomber et al
as 3:2023cv02107
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brent Fields
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Kathleen Allison, Raymond Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant:
J. Carrillo, F. Guzman, Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Winslow v. Macomber et al
as 3:2023cv02270
Petitioner:
Kellen B. Winslow, II
Respondent:
Jeffery McComber and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Claudio v. PIA Industries Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01965
Plaintiff:
Robert Claudio
Defendant:
PIA Industries Inc., Bierbaum, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
