Cases 51 - 60 of 56,108
Koulouras v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Spero Koulouras
Defendant:
UnitedHealth Group, Inc., United Healthcare Services, Inc. and UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Cathey v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Vivian Omilia Cathey
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hernandez Gonzalez v. Macomber et al
as 3:2024cv00938
Petitioner:
Jorge Hernandez Gonzalez
Respondent:
Jeffrey Macomber and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Castro v. Cintas Corporation No. 3 et al
as 3:2024cv00932
Plaintiff:
Damian A. Castro
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 3 and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Law Office Guy Levy, Inc. et al v. Scripps Health et al
as 3:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Law Office Guy Levy, Inc. a Corporation doing business as Guy Levy Law and Thomas Mahlman
Defendant:
Scripps Health, Regus Management Group LLC, Optum and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Kohler v. Whaleco, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Kristen Kohler
Defendant:
Whaleco, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as Temu and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Arguello v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00937
Plaintiff:
Israel Arguello
Defendant:
John Doe and J. Agredano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
