Cases 31 - 40 of 15,627
Reavis v. Spokane County Jail
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Blake M Reavis
Defendant:
Spokane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Robin Pena
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Winterer v. United States
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jared Anthony Winterer
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05055
Plaintiff:
Sam Joseph Flowers
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Yancey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A Yancey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Linse v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Valerie Joy Linse
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Churchill et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, a foreign company
as 1:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lynn Churchill and Chanc Guffey
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United Financial Casualty Company v. Mota et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
United Financial Casualty Company
Defendant:
Esequiel Mota, Luciano Mota Ocampo, Bernardo Tapia Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
HD Supply Facilities Maintenance LTD v. Showers et al
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, LTD.
Defendant:
Brandon Showers and Mark Arland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith v. Future Motion Inc
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Travis Smith
Defendant:
Future Motion Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
