Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Lewis v. Skagit County et al
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Robert H Lewis, III
Defendant:
Skagit County, Skagit Valley Hospital, Emergency Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv06042
Plaintiff:
Richard Wesley Bryan
Defendant:
Shauna Johnson, Alison H Sonntag, Amber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fakih v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01442
Petitioner:
Abdallah Fakih
Respondent:
H. Barron and C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Parviz v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01407
Petitioner:
Mahsa Parviz
Respondent:
H Barron and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Combs v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv05727
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Combs
Defendant:
Eric B Smith, Corey D Evans and Carter H Whipple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Samantha Hernandez
Respondent:
H. Barron, C. Peters, H Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Espinoza v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv00967
Petitioner:
jacqueline espinoza
Respondent:
H. Barron, C. Peters, H Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Patel v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv00937
Petitioner:
Ashokkumar Patel
Respondent:
H. Barron, C. Peters, H Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Littlefield v. Strange et al
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tyler Littlefield
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Michelle Duncan, Jason Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
