Cases 51 - 60 of 3,334
Lindahl v. Thatcher
as 3:2024cv05160
Petitioner:
Peter Anton Lindahl
Respondent:
Thatcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gossett v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05131
Petitioner:
Mark Jonathan Gossett
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Felder v. Ahern
as 2:2024cv00381
Petitioner:
Marcus Dieter Felder and Marcus Felder
Respondent:
Gregory J. Ahern and Gregory J Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gossett v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05130
Petitioner:
Mark J Gossett
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05122
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Marshall v. Mason
as 2:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
Steven Maurice Marshall
Respondent:
Dean Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America and Donald J Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Dranoel Enaj Brown
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gargar v. Thompson
as 2:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Abdulkadir Osman Gargar
Respondent:
State of Washington and Mark Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
