Cases 71 - 80 of 7,666
Langworthy v. Clallam County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv05258
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
Clallam County Sheriff, Alex Schodowski, Dave Neupert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zayas v. Howard et al
as 2:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Myriam Zayas
Defendant:
Sylvia Howard and Christina McMullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mikanda v. Christie
as 2:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Neyembo Mikanda
Defendant:
Christopher J Christie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reinke v. Ternus et al
as 3:2024cv05398
Plaintiff:
Brian Reinke
Defendant:
Rob Ternus, Michael Erenfelt, Darrell Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moquete v. GNC Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05393
Plaintiff:
Lea Moquete
Defendant:
GNC Holdings LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Singleton et al v. Clark County et al
as 3:2024cv05392
Plaintiff:
Dalynne Singleton, JM, SM and others
Defendant:
Clark County, NaphCare Inc, Alyssa Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Heinz v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Brian Heinz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
DeGross et al v. Hunter et al
as 3:2024cv05225
Plaintiff:
Jennifer DeGross and Shane DeGross
Defendant:
Ross Hunter, Ruben Reeves, Natalie Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
