Cases 21 - 30 of 1,126
Asimba v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Maureen Achieng Asimba
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Norton v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Daniel Norton
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Toth et al
as 2:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Daniel Toth and Jose Cendejas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Planque v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department Office of Police Accountability, Seattle Police Department, Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Rory M Planque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
