Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Alfarag v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al
as 2:2024cv01500
Defendant:
United States Attorney for the Western District of Washington and United States Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff:
Majid Alfarag
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00224
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. Davis Law Group et al
as 2:2023cv01168
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Davis Law Group, United States Attorneys, Office of the Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. United States Military et al
as 2:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
United States Military, United States Attorney, Ann Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Blevins v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives et al
as 2:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Shondolyn R Blevins
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol Tabacco Firearms and Explosives, United States Attorney's Office and Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
