Cases 101 - 110 of 139
Mark Sutton v. USDC-CAC
as 09-72386
:
In re: MARK ANTHONY SUTTON
Petitioner:
MARK ANTHONY SUTTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
BEN CURRY
William Earl Johnson v. Ben Curry
as 09-71784
Petitioner:
WILLIAM EARL JOHNSON
Respondent:
BEN CURRY
Patricia Currie v. Ruth Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv02690
Plaintiff:
Enne Currie
Defendant:
Patricia Johnson, Ruth Stringer, Mildred Morisaki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Powell's Books, Inc., et al v. John Kroeger, et al
as 09-35153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
POWELL'S BOOKS, INC., OLD MULTNOMAH BOOK STORE, LTD., DBA Annie Bloom's Books, DARK HORSE COMICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OREGON, CANDACE MORGAN, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HARDY MYERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, MATT SHIRTCLIFF, Baker County District Attorney, in his official capacity, JOHN HAROLDSON, Benton County District Attorney, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
THE THOMAS JEFFERSON CENTER FOR THE PROTECTION OF FREE EXPRESSION
American Civil Liberties Union, et al v. John Kroger, et al
as 09-35154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OREGON, CANDACE MORGAN, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
POWELL'S BOOKS, INC., OLD MULTNOMAH BOOK STORE, LTD., DBA Annie Bloom's Books, DARK HORSE COMICS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HARDY MYERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, MATT SHIRTCLIFF, Baker County District Attorney, in his official capacity, JOHN HAROLDSON, Benton County District Attorney, in his official capacity and others
Garland Stovall v. Ben Curry
as 09-70232
Petitioner:
GARLAND LEWIS STOVALL
Respondent:
ROSIE B. GARCIA, Warden and BEN CURRY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
