Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Jeremy Pinson v. Estrada, et al
as 21-15531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, USP Tucson, ANN ASH, ENGLAND, named as FNU England and others
Martin v. State Bar of California et al
as 4:2021cv01451
Defendant:
Sherrie B. McLetchie, Hailyn Chen, Tracie L Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Kenneth Martin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Andre Mae v. William Barr
as 20-71670
Petitioner:
ANDRE NEWTON MAE
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Newton v. National Commercial Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv02081
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and National Commercial Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Treasure Newton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gavin Davis v. Jason Adler, et al
as 20-55157
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMERON FIFE, JONATHAN NEWTON, JASON M. ADLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAVIN B. DAVIS
Brian Newton v. Parker Drilling Mgmt. Svcs., et al
as 20-55146
Defendant:
PARKER DRILLING MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., a Nevada Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN NEWTON, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
PARKER DRILLING MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LTD., Erroneously Sued As Parker Drilling Management Services, Inc.
Jeremy Pinson v. Estrada, et al
as 20-15068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, USP Tucson, ESTRADA, named as Nurse Estrada, SCHULER, named as Nurse Schuler and others
Defendant:
ENGLAND, named as FNU England, MCMILLON, named as FNU McMillon, NEWTON KENDIG and others
Newton Lindoff v. Earl Houser
as 20-35008
Petitioner / Appellant:
NEWTON LINDOFF
Respondent / Appellee:
EARL HOUSER
Theodore Newton v. S. Eatmon, et al
as 19-56478
Defendant:
T. VILLANUEVA, SSA, Appeals Coordinator
Defendant / Appellee:
S. EATMON, Correctional Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEODORE J. NEWTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
