Cases 31 - 40 of 2,073
Zaslavsky v. Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2367
Plaintiff:
NEAL S. ZASLAVSKY, ATTORNEY, an individual
Defendant:
CONSUMER ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES, a California non-profit corporation, MINH TRI NGUYEN, an individual, IBIERE SECK, an individual and others
William Lewis Ross III v. Arrowhead Credit Union et al
as 5:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Ross, III
Defendant:
Arrowhead Credit Union and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Razuki v. AmGUARD Insurance Company, et al.
as 24-2352
Plaintiff:
SALAM RAZUKI
Defendant:
AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY GUARD INSURANCE COMPANIES and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Morrow v. Genius Fund, et al.
as 24-2306
Plaintiff:
ANDREA MORROW
Defendant:
GENIUS FUND, LIAM PALMIERI, CHRIS FINELLI and others
Ahir, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2268
Plaintiff:
NIKESHKUMAR AHIR, PINTUBEN NIKESHKUMAR AHIR and PAWANPUTRA 108, INC.
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER, RYAN TAGUINES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Palomo v. Best Buy Stores L.P., et al.
as 24-2181
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PALOMO
Defendant:
BEST BUY STORES L.P., DAMIEN PADA, FADI AMMOURI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
