Cases 51 - 60 of 76
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2013cv05760
Plaintiff:
Richard Hurrle
Defendant:
Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
In re: Cheryl May Kelmar
as 2:2013cv04737
Appellant:
Cheryl May Kelmar
In Re Debtor:
Cheryl May Kelmar
Appellee:
Real Time Resolutions, Inc. and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Rodriguez v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00728
Plaintiff:
Elvin Rodriguez
Defendant:
Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gonzalez et al v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00541
Plaintiff:
Cesar Gonzalez and Anel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. , Real Time Resolutions, Inc. and Does 1 thorugh 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cheryl Kelmar v. USDC-CALA
as 12-73649
:
In re: CHERYL KELMAR
Petitioner:
CHERYL KELMAR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, HARBOR VIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, 2006-12 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07784
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Cheryl Kelmar v. USDC-CALA
as 12-72332
:
In re: CHERYL KELMAR
Petitioner:
CHERYL KELMAR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, HARBOR VIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, 2006-12, WELLS FARGO BANK LTD. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
