Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 9,974
Goode v. Canedo, et al.
as 24-3448
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN DENNIS GOODE
Defendant: J. CANEDO, Then, Correctional Sergeant; Now, Correctional Lieutenant, JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-100, Correctional Staff and J. CANEJO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re: John Walter Scott Acheson III
as 2:2024rd00024
Not Yet Classified: John Walter Scott Acheson, III
In re: Elliot John Carlsen
as 2:2024rd00029
Jutla et al v. Redfin Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00464
Plaintiff: Rajninder Raven Jutla and In Love Properties LLC
Defendant: Redfin Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-1000
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Patacsil, et al. v. Google LLC, et al.
as 24-3387
Plaintiff: NAPOLEON PATACSIL, individually, and on behalf of other persons similarly situated, GEORGE JACK, MARK CARSON and others
Appellant: JOHN ANDREN, MATTHEW LILLEY and JOSEPH S. ST. JOHN
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC, XXVI HOLDINGS INC and ALPHABET INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01498
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Banta v. Hayashi, et al.
as 24-3324
Plaintiff: HUNTER BANTA, Individually and on behalf of his minor son, I.B.
Defendant: KEITH HAYASHI, KENNETH S. FINK, M.D., JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-25 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04341
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Westoil Marine Services, Inc. v. John Skow
as 8:2024cv01120
Petitioner: Westoil Marine Services, Inc.
Respondent: John Skow
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?