Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Simpson v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv05545
Plaintiff:
Richard Simpson
Defendant:
State of Washington, Thurston County Prosecutor's Office, Aaron Pruneda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
United States of America v. Chau et al
as 3:2017cv05526
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Stephen C Mason, Kien Chau, Trinh Nghia and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Ragan v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Richard B Ragan
Defendant:
United States of America and Unknown Named Employee(s) of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 925
Durham v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv05113
Plaintiff:
Carl E Durham
Defendant:
United States of America and Unknown Named Employee(s) of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
Shcolnik v. Select Portfolio Servicing, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00129
Plaintiff:
Marilynn Shcolnik
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, LLC , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Engen v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2013cv01024
Petitioner:
Carol Engen
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service and Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Engen v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2013mc00084
Petitioner:
Carol Engen
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service and Unknown Agents
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller et al v. Kimsey et al
as 3:2012mc05003
Plaintiff:
Lowell D Miller
Defendant:
Greg Kimsey, Tony Golik, Curtis G Wyrick and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
