Cases 91 - 100 of 10,155
Taylor v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor, Melo, Musa and others
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections, Snake River Superintendent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinsey-Pace v. Douglas County Sheriff Office
as 6:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
David D. McKinsey-Pace
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Oregon Corrections Enterprise
as 2:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant:
Oregon Corrections Enterprise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meriweather v. Reyes
as 2:2024cv00652
Petitioner:
Thomas Nicholas Meriweather
Respondent:
Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benitez v. Washington County
as 3:2024cv00361
Petitioner:
Gerardo Luna Benitez
Respondent:
Washington County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benitez v. Washington County
as 3:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
Gerardo Luna Benitez
Respondent:
Washington County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maggio v. Providence Hospital
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maggio
Defendant:
Providence Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernards v. Prod Holding Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Jacob James Bernards
Defendant:
Prod Holding Inc., Progressive Leasing LLC, Progressive Finance U.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beltran v. Salem Police Department
as 6:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Beltran
Defendant:
Salem Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Pope
as 2:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant:
Timothy Ray Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
