Cases 11 - 20 of 201
(PC) Dunigan v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson, C.S.P. LA County, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Valenzuela v. Schmidt et al
as 2:2022cv01109
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Valenzuela
Defendant:
T Schmidt, G Meyers, E Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Meyers v. Kernan et al
as 1:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Leon Lee Meyers
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, K. Allison, R. Gamboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uhuru v. Benavidez
as 4:2022cv02435
Petitioner:
Kohen Diallo Uhuru, Diallo Dynomite and Diallo Earl Uhuru
Respondent:
Warden, J. Benavidez, Robert Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Clark
as 4:2022cv02266
Petitioner:
Leon L. Meyers
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Veaver v. Honea et al
as 2:2020cv02554
Plaintiff:
William F.B. Veaver
Defendant:
Andrea Thompson, Brian Meyer, Korey Honea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Achtley et al
as 5:2020cv08349
Defendant:
Chief Dep. Warden T. Lemon, Chief Dep. Warden E. Borla, Governor Gavin Newsom and others
Plaintiff:
Zuri Sana-Kabisa Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Ortez et al
as 4:2020cv07706
Defendant:
Robert Fleshman, Brian Hill, Geri Onta and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Meyers v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2020cv04330
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and Gigi Mattson
Petitioner:
Michael C. Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tampico v. Meyer et al
as 4:2020cv02713
Defendant:
Paul Meyer, Unknown Alameda County District Attorney, Timothy Painter and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Tampico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
