Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United States of America for the use and benefit of Bombard Electric, LLC v. JE Dunn Construction Company et al
as 2:2020cv01200
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company, JE Dunn Construction Company, Sustainable Modular Management, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Bombard Electric, LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Williams & Sons Masonry, Inc. v. LG Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02677
Plaintiff:
Williams & Sons Masonry, Inc.
Defendant:
LG Services, Inc. and International Fidelity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States for the use of Hajoca Corporation v. Aeroplate Corporation, et al.
as 1:2012cv01287
Plaintiff:
United States for the use of Hajoca Corporation
Defendant:
Aeroplate Corporation, Mary Williams and Ronald D. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
United States for the Use and Benefit of Sherwin Williams Company v. JR Ball Contracting Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv05889
Plaintiff:
Sherwin Williams Company
Defendant:
JR Ball Contracting Group, Inc. and The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2011cv05887
Plaintiff:
Sherwin Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Lampshire v. Takota Corporation, a Nevada corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02519
Plaintiff:
William James Lampshire
Defendant:
Takota Corporation and Guarantee Company of North America, USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
LAMPSHIRE v. TAKOTA CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation et al
as 2:2007at01116
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES LAMPSHIRE
Defendant:
TAKOTA CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation and THE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
