Miller Act Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 125
United States of America et al v. IPI Construction et al
as 3:2024cv00317
Plaintiff: United States of America and ISEC, Incorporated
Defendant: IPI Construction, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Does 1 through 100
Cross Defendant: The Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
Martin Brothers Construction v. MOWA-Barlovento Joint Venture A et al
as 2:2023cv00543
Plaintiff: Martin Brothers Construction
Defendant: MOWA-Barlovento Joint Venture A and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Martin Brothers Construction v. MOWA-Barlovento Joint Venture A et al
as 2:2023at00279
Plaintiff: Martin Brothers Construction
Defendant: MOWA-Barlovento Joint Venture A and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States Of America et al v. Cornerstone Contracting Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01350
Plaintiff: D&B Interiors, LLC United States of America, for the use and benefit of doing business as DBI Construction, United States of America and D & B Interiors, LLC an Oregon limited liability company doing business as DBI Construction
Defendant: Cornerstone Contracting Inc., WBE - CCI Joint Venture One LLC and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Zuheir, Inc. v. Straub Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00957
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Zuheir, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Comprehensive Glassworks, Inc.
Defendant: Straub Construction, Inc. and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of J.A. Placek Construction Co. et al v. Hal Hays Construction, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00472
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of J.A. Placek Construction Co. and J.A. Placek Construction Co.
Defendant: Hal Hays Construction, Inc., Western Surety Company and American Contractors Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Keeno Farms Construction Co., Inc. v. David Boland, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00021
Defendant: David Boland, Inc. and Western Surety Company
Plaintiff: Keeno Farms Construction Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States Of America, for the use and benefit of Steven Field Plumbing v. Anderson Burton Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv08774
Plaintiff: United States Of America, for the use and benefit of STEVEN FIELD PLUMBING
Defendant: Western Surety Company and Anderson Burton Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Steven Field Plumbing v. Anderson Burton Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02346
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Steven Field Plumbing
Defendant: Western Surety Company and Anderson Burton Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES, For the Use of BOWEN ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL, a California General Partnership et al v. Hal Hays Construction, Inc., a California corporation et al
as 1:2020at00660
Plaintiff: Bowen Engineering and Environmental, Daniel E Bowen, Erik Bowen and others
Defendant: Hal Hays Construction, Inc., a California corporation and Western Surety Company, a South Dakota corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?