Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv08968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Hensley v. Pourhassan et al
as 3:2021cv05593
Plaintiff:
Billie Ray Hensley
Defendant:
Nader Z. Pourhassan, Scott A. Kelly, Michael Mulholland and others
Nominal Defendant:
CytoDyn, Inc. and CytoDyn Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lavin v. Pourhassan et al
as 3:2021cv05465
Defendant:
Samir R. Patel, Nader Z. Pourhassan, Scott A. Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lavin
Nominal Defendant:
CytoDyn Inc
Berndt v. Kelly et al
as 3:2021cv05422
Defendant:
MD Samir R Patel, Jordan G Naydenov, MD Scott A Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
David Berndt
Nominal Defendant:
CytoDyn Inc
Sonny McPherson v. Robert A. Kotick et al
as 2:2019cv04861
Defendant:
Barry Meyer, Spencer Neumann, Activision Blizzard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sonny McPherson
Trotter v. Meserve et al
as 5:2019cv00501
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BLACKBURN and John Trotter
Defendant:
Jason Wells, Barbara L. Rambo, Richard C. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Placer Mining Corporation v. Atlas Mining Group, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2018cv00203
Plaintiff:
Placer Mining Corporation
Defendant:
Atlas Mining Group, L.L.C., Kelly Holdings, L.L.C. and Bunker Hill Ventures, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bushkin v. Rambo et al
as 3:2016cv00973
Plaintiff:
Bushkin and Andrew S. Bushkin
Defendant:
Rambo, Barry Lawson Williams, Barbara L. Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric Spitzer v. Rodney C Sacks et al
as 5:2013cv00833
Defendant:
Norman C Epstein, Hilrod Holdings LP, Thomas J Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Spitzer
Leon Graham v. PAINTER SMITH AND GORIAN INC et al
as 2:2012cv00377
Defendant:
PETER DIXON, Peter Dixon, GEORGE GORIAN and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Graham
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
