Cases 1 - 10 of 31
In re: Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
as 3:2023md03084
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe LSA 340, Katherine Hylin, E. R. and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser, LLC, Raiser-CA, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Bret Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
P. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03846
Plaintiff:
D. P.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Ohan v. Fontoura et al
as 3:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Festus Okwudili Ohan
Defendant:
Armando B. Fontoura, Paula T. Dow and Charles P. Rettig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Rebecca Berry Rivetti v. Daniel A. Ravetti
as 2:2021cv09712
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Berry Rivetti
Defendant:
Daniel A. Ravetti, John P. Galanis and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Meiller v. Frederick, et al.
as 1:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Brandie Meiller
Defendant:
Ladeene Bedford Frederick, David P Hamilton, Karen Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shayla Fite et al v. Michael Beasley, Jr.
as 2:2021cv03908
Defendant:
Michael P. Beasley, Jr.
Plaintiff:
The Fite Brand, LLC and Shayla Fite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Dunbar v. Airbnb, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00648
Plaintiff:
John P. Dunbar
Defendant:
Airbnb, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanson v. Noch et al
as 3:2019cv01326
Defendant:
Does 1 - 10, Brazy Records LLC, Vito Michael Roppo and others
Plaintiff:
Theo Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wayson v. McGrady
as 3:2018cv00163
Plaintiff:
Mark N. Wayson
Defendant:
Chadwick P. McGrady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malloy v. Primary Care Specialists et al
as 4:2016cv00411
Plaintiff:
Steven P Malloy
Defendant:
Primary Care Specialists, Nick Rasmussen and Stephanie Follet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
