Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Danny Campbell v. Delma Ann, LLC, et al
as 23-35088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY E. CAMPBELL
Defendant / Appellee:
DELMA ANN, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, RICHARD W. WOOD and PORT OF NEWPORT
Adame et al v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
Myrna Adame, Sidney Aguilar, Jason Albert and others
Defendant:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Inc., General Dynamics Corporation, Inc., General Dynamics NASSCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 pi Marine Personal Injury
Wood v. Holland America Line NV et al
as 2:2020cv01646
Defendant:
HAL Nederland N.V., Holland America Line USA Inc., HAL Antillen N.V. and others
Plaintiff:
Brianne E. Wood and Brianne E Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Delma Ann, LLC et al
as 6:2020cv00591
Defendant:
Delma Ann, LLC, Port of Newport, Richard W Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Danny E Campbell and Danny E. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Diane Goodwin v. Blaine E. Woods et al
as 2:2014cv07210
Defendant:
Azure Seas, Virginia M. Brown and Blaine E. Woods
Plaintiff:
Diane Goodwin
:Fred-Francis et al v. Woods et al
as 2:2012cv02048
Plaintiff:
:Mark-Edward
Defendant:
Thomas M Woods, Jenny Anne Durkan, Andrew D Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Goodwin v. Woods et al
as 3:2012cv01770
Plaintiff:
Diane Goodwin
Defendant:
Blaine E. Woods, Virginia M. Brown and Azure Seas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Eppard v. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution et al
as 3:2009cv02668
Plaintiff:
Gavin Eppard
Defendant:
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and DOES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Wood v. De Rensis Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00359
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wood
Defendant:
De Rensis Associates, Inc. and Challenger Waterskiing Kihei, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
