Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Weaver v. Checkr Incorporated
as 2:2022cv01090
Plaintiff:
Victor L Weaver
Defendant:
Checkr Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vondran v. Antonelli et al
as 2:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Steven C Vondran
Defendant:
Jeffrey J Antonelli, Law Offices of Jeffrey J Antonelli Limited, Tristan Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Maria Elena Prado Bolanos v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv06131
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Prado Bolanos
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation, John Weaver and DOES 1 to 30
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tyrone Adams v. Charles Easley, et al
as 12-16537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE L. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. EASLEY, ANDREW J. PAULSON, CGLS, INC., AKA Lee Road Investors and others
Adams v. Easley et al
as 4:2011cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Adams
Defendant:
Charles L. Easley, Andrew J. Paulson, Etal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weaver v. USDA Forest
as 1:2010cv01523
Plaintiff:
David Lee Weaver
Defendant:
USDA Forest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salcido v. Madera County et al
as 1:2010at00064
Plaintiff:
Jacob Salcido
Defendant:
Madera County, Madera County Sheriff's Department, Jeffery A Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weaver v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2009cv01135
Plaintiff:
Lester Weaver
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
NOT USED
as 3:2009cv00339
Plaintiff:
Lester Weaver
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
weaver v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2009cv01134
Plaintiff:
lester weaver
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
