Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 3:2012cv03319
Plaintiff:
Loretta Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seegmiller et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv03322
Plaintiff:
Darlene Seegmiller and Brent Seegmiller
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and American Medical Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 3:2012cv03321
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Smith and Richard Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nunley v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 3:2012cv03344
Plaintiff:
Brenda Nunley and William Nunley
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gable v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv03335
Plaintiff:
Angela Gable
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Cook Medical Incorporated and Cook Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv03336
Plaintiff:
Patricia Donelly Rogers and Troy Rogers
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson Inc., Ethicon Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 3:2012cv03134
Plaintiff:
Aubri Hanson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv03135
Plaintiff:
Joyce Ellis and Clifford Ellis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zamora v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv00870
Plaintiff:
Sharyn Zamora
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2012cv01564
Plaintiff:
Barbara Harris
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health & Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
