Antitrust Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Associated Food Stores, Inc. v. Tri-Union Seafoods, LLC, et al
as 3:2015cv04667
Plaintiff: Associated Food Stores, Inc.
Defendant: Tri-Union Seafoods, LLC, King Oscar, Inc., Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, f/k/a Bumble Bee Seafoods, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Associated Grocers of Florida, Inc. v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, et al
as 3:2015cv04536
Plaintiff: Associated Grocers of Florida, Inc.
Defendant: Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, f/k/a Bumble Bee Seafoods, LLC, Tri-Union Seafoods, LLC, Starkist Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Konarski et al v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2014cv02264
Plaintiff: Frank Konarski , Gabriela Konarski , Patricia Konarski and others
Defendant: Tucson, City of, Michael G Rankin, Catalina O Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Best Buy Co., Inc. et al v. Technicolor SA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv05264
Plaintiff: Best Buy Co., Inc. , Best Buy Purchasing LLC , Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and others
Defendant: Technicolor SA, Technicolor USA, Inc., Videocon Industries, Ltd. and others
Miscellaneou: Samsung SDI America Inc , SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD , Samsung SDI (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al v. Technicolor SA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv05262
Plaintiff: Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corp
Defendant: Technicolor SA, Technicolor USA, Inc., Videocon Industries, Ltd. and others
Miscellaneou: MT Picture Display Co., Ltd. , Panasonic Corporation of North America , Panasonic Corporation (f/k/a Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
RAIMONDO v. PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA et al
as 4:2013cv00791
Plaintiff: Kimberly Raimondo
Defendant: Panasonic Corporation of North America, Panasonic Corporation, Sanyo Electric Co, Ltd and others
Miscellaneou: ERIC L. CRAMER, DAVID F. SORENSEN and SARAH SCHALMAN-BERGEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff: The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
George Mothershed, I v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 12-16671
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE LLOYD MOTHERSHED, I, pro se
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel Oklahoma Bar Association, STEVEN W. TAYLOR, the Honorable Chief Justice, TOM J. COLBERT, the Honorable Vice-Chief Justice and others
In re: Andrea Resnick, et al v. Edmund Bandas, et al
as 12-15957
: In re: ONLINE DVD RENTAL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANDREA RESNICK, BRYAN EASTMAN, AMY LATHAM and others
Objector - Appellant: EDMUND F. BANDAS
Defendant - Appellee: NETFLIX, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WALMART.COM USA LLC
In re: Andrea Resnick, et al v. Edmund Bandas, et al
as 12-15957
Not Classified By Court: In re: ONLINE DVD RENTAL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: ANDREA RESNICK, BRYAN EASTMAN, AMY LATHAM and others
Appellant: EDMUND F. BANDAS
Defendant / Appellee: NETFLIX, INC., WALMART INC. and WALMART.COM USA LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?