Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Letricia Brown v. State of California, et al
as 23-55813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LETRICIA LAVERN BROWN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
EMED Technologies Corporation v. Repro-Med Systems, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00598
Defendant:
Andrew I Sealfon, Repro-Med Systems, Inc. and Repro-Med Systems, Inc. Doing business as RMS Medical Products
Plaintiff:
Emed Technologies Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Judge T John Ward
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Janet Ackerman, et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 5:2017cv01080
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Allison Tripp , Lindsay Smith , Katie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hernandez et al v. Sandoval et al
as 2:2012cv01933
Defendant:
Alicia's Motel, DMV, District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Nora Hernandez and Robin M. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Grant Goodman v. Mary Murguia
as 11-17090
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY C. STONE INCORPORATED
Defendant:
GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP
Real-party-in-interest - Appellant:
GRANT H. GOODMAN
Real-party-in-interest - Appellee:
MARY H. MURGUIA, Honorable, Judge
In re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007md01819
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Rhonda L. Jacobs, Sharon Defren and others
Defendant:
Renesas Technology America, Inc., Epson America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Not Yet Classified:
Kyocera Wireless Corporation, Smart Modular Technologies, Inc., Extreme Networks, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
David Bratton, Communication Mega-Sat Inc., Bryar Law Corporation and others
Interested Party:
James B Wright and Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Special Master:
Judge (Ret.) Fern M Smith and Martin Quinn
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robin McEntee
In Re:
Static Random Access Memory (SRAM)
Other:
Barbara Cochran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
