Cases 11 - 20 of 109
Doe et al v. Washoe County School District et al
as 3:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and J. DOE
Defendant:
Washoe County School District, Washoe County School District Board of Trustees and Washoe County School District Superintendent, Dr. Susan Enfeld
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Not Used
as 3:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Not Used
Defendant:
J. Doe, Washoe County School District, Washoe County School District Board of Trustees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. Washoe County School District et al
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and J. Doe
Defendant:
Washoe County School District, Washoe County School District Board of Trustees and Washoe County School District Superintendent, Dr. Susan Endfeld
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steven Levi v. Anchorage School District, et al
as 23-35170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN C. LEVI
Defendant / Appellee:
ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT, TIMOTHY BLAKE, Principal, JOY CHASTAGNER, Labor Relations Generalist and others
John Doe, et al v. San Diego Unified School District, et al
as 22-56136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE, an individual, JANE DOE, individually and as parent and next friend of Jill Doe, a minor child, JILL DOE, a minor child, by and through her next friend, Jane Doe and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, RICHARD BARRERA, in his official capacity as Board President, SHARON WHITEHURST-PAYNE, in her official capacity as Board Vice President and others
David Kissner v. Lawrence McVoy, et al
as 22-16838
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSNER
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE MCVOY
Defendant:
LOMA PRIETA JOINT UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, a California public agency, LISA FRASER, former superintendent at Loma Prieta Joint Union School District, in her official and individual capacities, COREY KIDWELL, former superintendent at Loma Prieta Joint Union School District, in her official and individual capacities and others
Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc., et al v. Alberto Carvalho, et al
as 22-55908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND, INC., a Wyoming Not-for-Profit Corporaton, JEFFREY FUENTES, SANDRA GARCIA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALBERTO CARVALHO, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Los Angeles United School District, ILEANA DAVALOS, in her official capacity as Chief Human Resources Officer for the Los Angeles School District, GEORGE MCKENNA and others
Human Rights Defense Center v. Jeffrey Uttecht, et al
as 22-35762
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden, Superintendent of Coyote Ridge Corrections Center of the Washington Department of Corrections in his individual and official capacities and JOHN D. TURNER, Mailroom Sergeant of Coyote Ridge Corrections Center in his individual and official capacities
Jacquelyn Miller v. Dylan Farris, et al
as 22-55764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACQUELYN MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
DYLAN FARRIS, TUSD Chief Personnel Officer of Human Resources, KEITH BUTLER, TUSD Chief Business Officer of the Business Office, JEREMY GERSON, Vice President of the TUSD Board of Education and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN
Childrens Health Defense California Chapter et al. v. Placentia Yorba Linda Unified School District et al
as 8:2022cv01057
Plaintiff:
CHILDRENS HEALTH DEFENSE-CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, a California 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, CHRIS PALICKE, CHRIS PALICKE, an individual as Guardian Ad Litem for his minor child, AIDAN PALICKE and others
Defendant:
PLACENTIA-YORBA LINDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a local educational agency in the County of Orange, YORBA LINDA HIGH SCHOOL, a public school within the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District, JIM ELSASSER, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
