Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Hill et al v. Opus Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv04806
Plaintiff:
Randy Ackerman, Jeffrey Dickerson, James Fritcher and others
Defendant:
Keith Bednarowski, Luz Campa, Does and others
O'Rourke v. United States et al
as 3:2010cv00302
Plaintiff:
Albert O'Rourke
Defendant:
United States, University of California, County of San Diego and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rodd Fernandes v. Town of Pahrump, et al
as 10-15036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODD FERNANDES
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF PAHRUMP, DBA Pahrump Valley Fire-Rescue Services, COUNTY OF NYE, DBA Nye County Sheriff's Office and Coroner, ANTHONY L. DE MEO and others
Fernandes v. Town of Pahrump et al
as 2:2009cv00494
Plaintiff:
Rodd Fernandes
Defendant:
Town of Pahrump, County of Nye, Anthony L De Meo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
O. Schlenvogt v. Scott Marshall, et al
as 08-17196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
O. PAUL SCHLENVOGT
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT MARSHALL, MIGUEL VILLASENOR, MARK TROUGHTON and others
Marshall Home v. Quinton Mehr, et al
as 08-16916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL EDWIN HOME
Defendant - Appellee:
QUINTON MEHR, Arizona Department of Public Safety, GREG, ADOT MVD Division, HARRY, ADOT MVD Division and others
Home v. Mehr et al
as 4:2008cv00222
Plaintiff:
Marshall E Home
Defendant:
Quentin Mehr, Greg, Harry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marshall Reddick Realty Inc et al v. Asra Financial Inc et al
as 8:2008cv00343
Plaintiff:
Marshall Reddick Realty Inc and Marshall Reddick
Defendant:
Asra Financial Inc, Ron T Gardner, Chuck Deckard and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Emma Marshall v. Long Beach Mortgage Company
as 2:2007cv00682
Plaintiff:
Emma Marshall
Defendant:
Long Beach Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
