Cases 151 - 160 of 4,252
Colbert v. Bennett
as 2:2023cv01122
Petitioner:
Bobby Darrell Colbert
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lupercio v. Tulare County Superior Court
as 3:2023cv05686
Petitioner:
Ramon Navarro Lupercio
Respondent:
Tulare County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ragland v. Bennett
as 3:2023cv05574
Petitioner:
John Benton Ragland
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv05563
Petitioner:
Bartholomew Lee Jones
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roach v. Attorney General
as 3:2023cv05528
Petitioner:
John Edward Roach
Respondent:
Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shenefield v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv05617
Petitioner:
Damien Michael Shenefield
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fernandez v. Bennett
as 3:2023cv05582
Petitioner:
Smokey Fernandez
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Bennett
as 3:2023cv05585
Petitioner:
Melvin Marcus Johnson, Jr
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kyran v. Ferguson
as 3:2023cv05522
Petitioner:
John Lien Kyran
Respondent:
Robert Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sellards-Reck v Shook et al
as 3:2023cv05516
Petitioner:
Cassandra Sellards-Reck
Respondent:
David Shook, Christine Pomeroy, Jon Pound and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.