Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Maxcium Herring v. L. S. McEwen
as 12-55825
Petitioner - Appellant:
MAXCIUM HERRING
Respondent - Appellee:
L. S. MCEWEN, Warden
Kinson Her v. Francisco Jacquez
as 11-17261
Petitioner - Appellant:
KINSON HER
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANCISCO JACQUEZ
Her v. Haviland
as 2:2010cv03085
Petitioner:
Na Her
Respondent:
J.W. Haviland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dion Isaac Herring v. L. S. McEwen
as 2:2010cv03749
Petitioner:
Dion Isaac Herring
Respondent:
L. S. McEwen
Carlous Daily v. Kathy Prosper, et al
as 10-55729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOUS LINDELL DAILY
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHY PROSPER, Warden, individually and official capacity and DEBRA ABBOTT, individually and in her official capacity as Supervisor of Clerical Functions
Julian de Medeiros v. Katrina Kane, et al
as 10-15732
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN GAGO DE MEDEIROS
Respondent - Appellee:
KATRINA S. KANE, in her official capacity as District Director, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, BRUNO STOLC, in his official capacity as Warden, CCA Eloy Detention Center, Eloy, Arizona, JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Janet Napolitan, et al v. Guillermo Ortiz
as 09-17822
Petitioner - Appellee:
GUILLERMO ORTIZ
Respondent - Appellant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General Department of Justice, JANET NAPOLITANO, in her official capacity as Secretary Department of Homeland Security and JAMES SCHOMIG, Warden, Eloy Detention Center, CCA
Herring v. Washington State Penitentiary et al
as 2:2009cv01637
Petitioner:
Burnis Herring
Respondent:
Washington State Penitentiary and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Karen Chades v. Mary Lattimore
as 09-55442
Petitioner - Appellant:
KAREN DENISE CHADES, through her Next Friend Marie Gallegos
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY LATTIMORE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
