Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Totress v. Agnew et al
as 2:2017cv04681
Petitioner:
Tommy Maurice Totress
Respondent:
Carla Hacker Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. Agnew et al
as 2:2017cv01430
Petitioner:
Anthony William Coleman
Respondent:
Carla Hacker Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mejia v. Hacker-Agnew et al
as 2:2017cv00909
Petitioner:
Jaime Mejia
Respondent:
Carla Hacker-Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cox v. Agnew et al
as 2:2017cv00596
Petitioner:
Walter John Cox, Jr.
Respondent:
Carla Hacker Agnew and Arizona Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Hacker-Agnew et al
as 2:2017cv00439
Petitioner:
Martrail D Williams
Respondent:
Carla Hacker-Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montiel v. Hacked-Agnew et al
as 3:2017cv08017
Petitioner:
Kenneth Allen Montiel
Respondent:
Carla Hacked-Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vasko v. Hacker-Agnew et al
as 3:2017cv08001
Petitioner:
Gary Vasko
Respondent:
Carla Hacker-Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Hacker-Agnew et al
as 4:2016cv00731
Petitioner:
Raul Rene Martinez
Respondent:
Carla Hacker-Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lunsford v. Hacker-Agnew et al
as 2:2016cv03216
Petitioner:
Gregory Joe Lunsford
Respondent:
Carla Hacker-Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Inzunza v. Hacker-Agnew et al
as 2:2016cv01337
Petitioner:
Gildardo Gonzales Inzunza
Respondent:
Carla Hacker-Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
