Cases 51 - 60 of 781
Fields v. Troyer
as 3:2022cv05593
Petitioner:
William Eugene Fields
Respondent:
Pierce County of the State of Washington and Ed Troyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. State of Washington
as 1:2022cv03128
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Demos, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 22-35589
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF WASHINGTON
John Demos, Jr. v. State of Washington
as 22-35620
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
John Demos, Jr. v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 22-35746
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY R. INSLEE, Governor of the State of Washington, CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary Dept. of Corrections and ROB M. JACKSON, Superintendent - Washington State Pentientiary
John Demos, Jr. v. State of Washington
as 22-35678
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Emanuel Finch, Sr. v. State of Washington, et al
as 22-35696
Petitioner / Appellant:
EMANUEL L. FINCH, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON and JAMES KEY, Superintendent, Airway Heights Corrections Center
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00768
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Demos v. State of Washington
as 2:2022cv00765
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rotchford v. State of Washington
as 2:2022cv00727
Petitioner:
Fraser McDonough Rotchford
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
