General Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 205
Pope v. Garrett
as 3:2022cv00904
Petitioner: Jason Thomas Pope
Respondent: Pat Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrett v. Moore et al
as 3:2022cv00864
Petitioner: Charles Devon Garrett
Respondent: Shawn Moore and The Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory Stiegler v. Tim Garrett, et al
as 22-15782
Petitioner / Appellant: GREGORY STIEGLER
Respondent / Appellee: TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
William Pagniano v. Garrett Laney
as 22-35398
Petitioner / Appellant: WILLIAM MARTIN PAGNIANO
Respondent / Appellee: GARRETT LANEY
Dewhurst v. Garrett
as 3:2022cv00702
Petitioner: James Andrew Dewhurst
Respondent: Pat Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Magana v. Garrett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00198
Petitioner: Jose A. Magana
Respondent: Tim Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brendan Nasby v. Tim Garrett, et al
as 22-15657
Petitioner / Appellant: BRENDAN NASBY
Respondent / Appellee: TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Rencher v. Garrett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00704
Plaintiff: Eddie Rencher, Jr.
Defendant: Garrett and Attorney General State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fernando Robles v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada, et al
as 22-15591
Petitioner / Appellant: FERNANDO ROBLES
Respondent / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and TIM GARRETT
Monte Burch v. Tim Garrett, et al
as 22-15572
Petitioner / Appellant: MONTE LEE BURCH
Respondent / Appellee: TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?