General Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dang v. Rackley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00362
Petitioner: Phong Dang
Respondent: Ronald Rackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dang v. Spearman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv06252
Petitioner: Huy Khanh Dang
Respondent: M. E. Spearman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dang v. McEwan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01955
Petitioner: Nghiem D Dang
Respondent: L S McEwan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tran Minh v. Guy Hall
as 10-35469
Petitioner - Appellant: TRAN DANG MINH
Respondent - Appellee: GUY HALL
Chanh Dang v. G. Giurbino We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-55706
Petitioner - Appellant: CHANH MINH DANG
Respondent - Appellee: G. J. GIURBINO, Warden, Centinela State Prison, Substituted for Sylvia Garcia, Substituted for Acting Warden Stuart Ryan, Substituted for Silvia Garcia
Tai Dang v. D. Sisto
as 08-16970
Petitioner - Appellant: TAI Q. DANG
Respondent - Appellee: D. K. SISTO, Warden
Si Dang v. Scott Kernan
as 08-16968
Petitioner - Appellant: SI VAN DANG
Respondent - Appellee: SCOTT M. KERNAN, Warden
Dang v. Curry We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv03845
Petitioner: Huy Dang
Respondent: B. Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dang v. Sisto We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv03268
Petitioner: Tai Q. Dang
Respondent: D. K. Sisto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Minh v. Hall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2007cv00465
Petitioner: Tran Dang Minh
Respondent: Guy Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?