Cases 1 - 10 of 1,773
Hayes v. Ryan et al
as 2:2022cv00774
Petitioner:
Kasey Markeith Hayes
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunlap #124173 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2021cv00282
Petitioner:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanders #118868 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2021cv00125
Petitioner:
Edward John Sanders
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanders #118868 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2020cv00326
Petitioner:
Edward John Sanders
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Ryan et al
as 4:2020cv00068
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Vanessa Lynn Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Molina #061492 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2020cv00009
Petitioner:
Juan C Molina
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Valenzuela v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05902
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Petitioner:
Catarino Torres Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen #133930 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05780
Petitioner:
Keith Edward Allen
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Defendant:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Billups #156407 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05771
Respondent:
David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Jordan Donald Billups
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill #276083 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05713
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan, William G Montgomery and others
Petitioner:
Jamal Jabarr Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
