Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Belcher v. Little, et al.
as 1:2022cv00433
Petitioner:
Camron Belcher
Respondent:
Governor Brad Little, Sergeant Gann, Warden Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emm v. Ortiz et al
as 3:2019cv00096
Petitioner:
Johanna Emm
Respondent:
Lieutenant Abel Ortiz and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walter Watson v. R. Davi
as 17-16603
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER WATSON
Respondent - Appellee:
R. DAVIS, Corr. Lieutenant, Warden
Bain v. Wolfe, et al
as 3:2016cv00458
Petitioner:
Fredrick Earl Bain
Respondent:
Lieutenant Debbie Hust, Sheriff Brian E. Wolfe and Michael Wu
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seibt v. Hartman et al
as 3:2016cv00099
Respondent:
Lieutenant Hartman and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Hans Seibt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William J Neufeld Jr v. Kenitz
as 2:2012cv07379
Respondent:
Lieutenant Kenitz
Petitioner:
William J Neufeld, Jr
Melvin Dukes v. Warden Cash et al
as 2:2011cv05112
Respondent:
Warden Cash, Captain Henderson, Lieutenant Meizrcth and others
Petitioner:
Melvin Dukes
Reno Rios v. CDCR, et al
as 11-16191
Petitioner - Appellant:
RENO FUENTES RIOS
Respondent - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JAMES E. TILTON and others
Melvin Dukes v. Cash et al
as 2:2011cv02410
Respondent:
Sgt Bowen, Warden Cash, Captain Gurman and others
Petitioner:
Melvin Dukes
Theodore Wilson v. Arnold Schwarzeneggar, et al
as 11-55183
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE O'DELL WILSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGAR, Governor, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
